Rizzi’s The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery and his Locality and t

In the two articles, Rizzis The Fine Structure of the Left fringe and his Locality and the Left Periphery, there does not seem to be any incompatibility but instead a steady focus on fist elucidating the structure of the left and using the left to refine the Relativized Minimality principle. The major issue is that issues presented in the first are not necessarily addressed in the second, similar details about the null constant. The second paper can be viewed as an additional paper that relies, to some degree, on the information presented in the first, bid the overall structure and some of the adverbial analyses. To that extent, it builds off of 1997. One of the main aims of Rizzi 1997 is to explore some aspects of the fine structure of the left periphery and to postulate an articulated array of X-bar projections which will be assumed to constitute the complimentizer system(Rizzi 1997281). He also addresses some of the adjacency and anti-adjacency effects involving elements o f the C system and different kinds of fillers of the undecided position (overt DP, PRO, trace) which are that are amenable to an explanation in terms of the assumed structure of the C system. Rizzi (1997) depends on a few features, that syntactical movement is last resort or that it must be a necessary quasi-morphological requirement, and that these requirements are Criteria requirements, the presence of a head entering into the required Spec-head flesh with the preposed phrase. Criteria requirements, unlike feature checking, will not disappear. Finally, Rizzi must also assume within the relativized minimality theory, Empty Category Principle (ECP), and the Head Movement simplicity (HMC) and thereof head government. The rele... ...new structure for the left periphery that looks like this Force Top* Int Top* counsel Mod* Top* Fin IPThis guide helps account for all of the different effects. We see these in examples (25), (26), (32-41), and (63). Adverbs are normally mod ifiers and quantifiers, and trigger minimality effects in wh-chains. Some belong only to the modifiers, like attentivement, and therefore do not have an effect on quantificational chains (Rizzi 2004 244). Simple adverb preposing targets the Mod position, but can also target the ordinary Focus position and negation belongs to both the quantificational class and the modifier class(Rizzi 2004244). This is one of the main differences between the first and second paper, the further analysis of the overall structure of the left periphery and how adverbs both help make it clear and how it explains their placement.